Logged in as —
Today, 52 creators are talking — three themes converging: AI cap-ex digestion, rate-cut repricing, and energy resilience. The unusual thing is conviction has spiked on OXY despite zero price action — analysts and investors agree for the first time in 6 weeks. TSLA is the loudest disagreement (45/31/24 bull/bear/mixed), driven by robotaxi headlines vs. fundamentals. Yesterday's flagged gem NTAP is +4.2% but volume is light — the thesis hasn't broken into mainstream chatter yet.
On AI cap-ex, the room is finally splitting into camps. Analysts are repricing the second derivative — the pace of spend, not the size — and NVDA's Q3 print was the easy beat; Q4 is where digestion either shows up or doesn't. Quality-side investors counter that data-centre revenue still ran +122% YoY, which doesn't reconcile with a digestion narrative. Hyperscalers report in 13 days — that's where this resolves.
Rate-cut repricing is the quieter shift. Three creators positioned for two H1 cuts have walked back to one in the past week, but the curve hasn't budged. That's repositioning into a fading signal — a crowded trade hardening just as the macro evidence weakens. "Soft landing" as a frame is dropping out of the conversation, and nothing has clearly replaced it yet.
Energy resilience is where OXY stands out. Bullish across analysts and investors simultaneously has only happened twice in the past year — both times preceded a 6–9% move within 4 weeks. Distinguish that from XOM, where the 88% bullishness is camps talking past each other: analysts on oil price, investors on dividend coverage. Same direction, different theses — a thinner signal than it looks.
AI noticed All three headwinds point at the same worry — companies are burning cash faster than expected. Different stories, same root cause.
We track how fast bearish wording is rising, not how loud it is. Click any gauge to open that ticker's bearish-side workspace view.
AI noticed 73% of the last 10 gem flags are still bullish 30 days later — meaningfully above the 50% null. The pattern that's working: low mention count + analyst-camp dominance + research-source corroboration.
Three tiers of evidence back today's briefing: tracked creator videos (numbered), SEC filings (S-prefix), and independent research (R-prefix, gold). Click any item to open the original.
Tracking 124 traders, investors and analysts — judged on what they actually do. Traders and investors in real dollars; analysts on quality of thesis. Different jobs, different bars.
Cumulative total return if you'd followed every bullish or bearish stance blindly — same sizing, held until change-of-heart or today. Traders and investors only: analysts don't issue directional positions, so plotting them here would mislead. Hover to see all creators at that date. REAL DATA.
Breaking down stocks, business, tech. Primary-source reading → assumption surfacing. 10-K first, narrative second.
Tracking IPO flow with forensic depth. CFA charterholder bringing institutional rigour to public-markets debut coverage.
Invest in Quality Businesses. Build real wealth. Low follower count, 19 years of real-money experience — a classic quiet compounder.
Most creators on this table issue explicit calls — buys, sells, trims, shorts — though not all do. The ranking only counts stances the creator marked as an explicit buy or sell; passive interest, "watching this name," or general bullishness/bearishness don't enter the PnL. That's deliberate — the dollar leaderboard rewards putting money where the mouth is. Conviction-weighted is the more reliable read: it scales each stance by the language strength behind it. Raw PnL is coarser — it doesn't model conviction or sizing — but it stays useful because every bullish or bearish thesis held until the creator changes mind (or to today if they don't) is roughly how an audience naturally receives these videos in the first place. Analysts who narrate companies without explicit calls aren't punished by absence — they're recognised below on a different bar: thesis quality, sector leadership, awards.
| # | Creator | Total Return | Alpha vs SPY | PnL ($) | Win | Vol | Sharpe | Max DD | Awards |
|---|
A note on raw PnL. The numbers above are useful but not the full story — they don't model conviction, position sizing, or the quality of what each creator owns. That's why we also surface conviction-weighted (language patterns gauging bullish strength) and fundamentals-weighted (FMP-backed deep-analysis scoring tickers /10, crediting creators only when their highest-conviction stances land on the strongest companies). Personal profiles go further still: per-creator views aren't ranked against others, just analysed in their own right.
Deep-dive the retail-trader tape — every YouTube, Reddit, X & Discord call on any stock, scored on real accuracy. AI deep research runs alongside to add context and verify each claim against filings, research & live data.
Opening NVDA — canvases are generating in the Studio on your right.
Click any canvas to expand. Ask here to chat. Tap the YouTube Deep Dive Studio button for the full creator picture.